Penelope The Musicplays On The Piano

Agency: the procedures adopted for the granting of subsidies does not appear to meet the basic requirements to ensure transparency

No internal control mechanisms.
According to a recent investigation by the Prosecutor of the Prosecutor Ricardo Renon Administrative Investigations (FIA) and the backing of the Attorney General Noailles
GF has recently produced the following opinion, that because of its extensive length excerpt follows:

" Starting time of the complaint, this FIA has conducted an investigation, that while on one side could not detect specific situations that warrant the promotion of disciplinary action (the court has already been initiated. No.10.152/09 Record of the National Criminal Court and Federal No .8, Secretariat No. 15, but it may arise evidence to reach a different conclusion) it has demonstrated a procedure not seem to meet the basic requirements necessary to ensure transparency in fund management públicos.Como already stated, this has been particularly appreciated in the absence of a clear mechanism to reconstruct the way in which funding was approved for a particular project, and if that procedure have involved people with opposing interests (coordinator or co-coordinators who choose peers who could be evaluated projects submitted by those coordinators or co-coordinators). Without prejudice to the confidentiality that may apply to any part of a process administration, particularly when it comes to granting funds, the State must proceed so that, if only retrospectively, the mechanism applied can be viewed in its entirety. Note that precisely in this research has been an obstacle to the identification of specific irregularities laxity of procedure followed in the cases examined, it has not allowed an accurate assessment of situations that may occur with some frequency (in the section V, has been demonstrated with certainty that this research allows only preliminary, the percentage of cases where coordinators or co-coordinators submit projects for evaluation would be raised -59.25% of the sample-). I have doubt that the procedure for granting credit lines in an agency involved state should be able to determine: 1 .- Who elects the evaluators; 2 .- what projects evaluated these, 3 .- mechanisms of rejection and / or recusal of the assessors, and 4 .- therefore accessible by evaluated the evidence that prove these facts (though this, again, for some reason it is preferable to occur at the end of the procedure). VIII that understanding, then I think it appropriate foster forward a certified copy of this record No.23.612/1592 the Honorable National Congress for assessing the appropriateness of incorporating in the legislation relating to the operation of the Agency the necessary control mechanisms in situations where conflicts are externalized of interest. This, without ignoring what is already established in the Law No.25.200 currently would not be applied by officials of the Agency in cases that have been examined and it seems obvious, it has taken the same view espíritu.Asimismo understand that correspond to forward copy of this report to Mr. Judge in charge of the National Criminal Court and Federal Correctional No.8, No.15 Secretariat in connection with your registration No.10.152/09 Cause. "
Research Office Administrative Fisc. No. 4, August 26
RICARDO 11/30/2010 RENOM Fiscal Administrative Investigations. FISCAL NOAILLES
FELIPE GUILLERMO GENERAL