Bow & Arrow Balloon Game

CONICET: a rebellion on the farm the CPA to the total indifference of the two guilds. CONICET

From: Karina Cherñajovsky < Cherkari@yahoo.com.ar >
Subject: Meeting Summary December 28 CONICET
To: cpa_conicet@gruposyahoo.com.ar
Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2011, 14:31

Dear all: Here we send a summary of the meeting held on 28 December CONICET the past. In addition will mail general comments and proposals made at the start of the meeting.

A hug and a desire that this year we can realize together our historic and claims.

Summaries Interview of December 28, 2010 with Dr. Marta Rovira and Dr. Vicente Macagno.

fellow was attended 32 different workplaces
Saavedra 15, CEFYBO, Academy of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Natural Sciences, CNEA, Faculty of Agronomy, CITEFA Institute of Anthropology, Darwinian, Faculty of Arts, Inst LANARI, et al. All were present.

Items to be played:

Retirement / joint negotiations / Roster - Staff salary Increase / Recovery Reports 7% Acceptable / Democratization

The Ministry is spearheading the efforts of retirement in relation to achieving 85% Dr. Ceccatto he told Dr. Rovira , which are well advanced but Dr. knew not tell if there is some progress since Dr. spoke
with us.

For more active support and efforts by the Board of CONICET
, said that the notes are useless for nothing and that political action is the most important being conducted by the MINCYT.

regard to the delivery of certification tasks, according to the terms of the law, lawyers are addressing the issue CONICET. Dr. Rovira said they do not want to incur a problem for the institution giving a certificate that is not considered appropriate because there the CPA officials who do ANSES research and asked whether they did research. Dr.
declined to give details because they said that they are still discussing the issue.

Dr Rovira and Dr. Macagno said that if they agree with the Support Staff access to 85% but another thing to say that this or that person does research.

they worked at the request of MinCyT to increase selective
the CPA, produced different tables, with the possibility
to give a similar increase for all and the possibility
B to give a greater increase in those with more preparation. We could show the note drafted but ultimately did little to nothing because they demand rose and was rejected.
The Minister said he could not do anything. Nor can get the mobility for researchers because Bossio said that there are no privileges for anybody. To go

500 new positions, ordered in December 2009 (between researchers and support staff) had to wait a year. This year, the 500 positions, 100 were for CPA.

That had to make many efforts for increased Budget CONICET and finally got 95 million to the management of the Assistant Secretary d Finance.
That can not be played to advance anything because it happened in 2008 that promised a 15% in October and paid but the decree was signed in February next and CONICET had to pay all those months with her own money.

Both the request for a special increase the CPA as the new appointments and the additional $ 900 of year-end are signs that the Board is concerned about the situation Race,

(Comment: it's worth noting that the surplus of $ 900 was for the entire SINEPAD low charges, and not a special award for members of the CPA , who are orrogó the same amount as the administration) although they got us this does not represent an improvement. Dr. Macagno pointed to the possible resignation of a highly qualified professional in Cordoba to attach to the private sector because they pay higher salaries and that they are concerned because they get lost most qualified human resources. They could not give an answer in relation to the recovery of 7% at Acceptable Reports also correspond to the researchers.

joint negotiations in relation to the Drs said he is not summoned by CONICET but the Ministry of Labour and the MinCyT have surgery. And who are the guilds who should put more emphasis on the calling. ( this sentence does not conform to the truth, because in time of Dr.Charreau members of the CPA suffered numerous wage increases, without intervention the joint, there was interest at that time and money, now there is no interest )
Staff
changes do not depend on internal factors. These changes are not easy to do.

regard to issues of democratization of commentators felt that the unions and their representatives participate in committees CIOTA, CIAT, etc. And on the other hand have a representative on the Evaluation Committees. Dr. Macagno
offered to meet regularly with a small group of support personnel to discuss some issues but not guaranteed that they could effectuate these changes.

Given the lack of responses in many of the issues raised by Drs said they can not lie to make do and what we convey is what they could do.